xAI released Grok 4.20 as a public beta on February 17, 2026, and it hit general availability on March 18, 2026. It ships three distinct API variants — reasoning, non-reasoning, and a multi-agent mode that runs four specialized agents in parallel and has them debate the answer before you see it.
The version name is deliberate. Elon Musk made it explicit: 4.20 is a cultural reference. Whether you find that charming or not, the underlying model is worth taking seriously.
The Three Variants
| API Model ID | Context | Input | Output | Mode |
|---|---|---|---|---|
grok-4.20-0309-reasoning |
1M tokens | $1.25/M | $2.50/M | Extended chain-of-thought |
grok-4.20-0309-non-reasoning |
1M tokens | $1.25/M | $2.50/M | Direct output |
grok-4.20-multi-agent-0309 |
2M tokens | $2.00/M | $6.00/M | Parallel agent debate |
The “0309” suffix means March 9, 2026 — a locked checkpoint. If xAI ships a new version, it gets a new date suffix. You can pin to this checkpoint and get consistent behavior indefinitely.
What “Reasoning” Means Here
The reasoning variant inserts an extended chain-of-thought pass before generating the final response. You don’t see the reasoning tokens, but you pay for them — they increase latency (time to first token averages around 10.85 seconds) and total token count.
The non-reasoning variant skips that pass and responds directly. Same model, same price per token, lower latency.
65% reduction in hallucinations is the key benchmark that reasoning adds over Grok 4.1. If your workload is simple, direct tasks where latency matters more than accuracy, use non-reasoning. If you’re doing multi-step problem solving, code debugging, or high-stakes inference where a wrong answer is costly, use reasoning.
The Multi-Agent Variant: Four Agents Debate Your Answer
The multi-agent variant is architecturally different. It doesn’t run one model and return a response. It runs four specialized agents — internally named Grok, Harper, Benjamin, and Lucas — in parallel. Each focuses on a different aspect of the problem (web search, data analysis, synthesis, peer review). They coordinate tool calls, share context, and debate their outputs before the system synthesizes a final answer.
At high or extra-high reasoning effort settings, the system scales up to 16 agents.
Why this matters: The debate step is what drives the hallucination number. On the Artificial Analysis Omniscience benchmark, which tests factual accuracy across a broad domain set, grok-4.20-multi-agent-0309 achieved a 78% non-hallucination rate — the highest of any model tested on that benchmark at the time of measurement. For comparison, the reasoning-only variant achieved 65% better than Grok 4.1 but not at the 78% level.
The tradeoff: 2x the input price, 2.4x the output price, and significantly more latency than the single-model variants.
Built-in capabilities for the multi-agent variant include:
- Web search
- X (formerly Twitter) search and real-time social data
- Code execution
- Collections search (RAG)
- Parallel function calling
- Structured outputs
Benchmark Summary
| Benchmark | Result | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4 | 48 | 8th overall at launch |
| Omniscience (non-hallucination rate) | 78% | Record at time of measurement (multi-agent) |
| IFBench (instruction following) | 83% | 1st place |
| τ²-Bench Telecom (agentic tool use) | 97% | 2nd place |
| Output speed | 197.4 tokens/second | Above average for reasoning-class models |
The 78% Omniscience result is what separates Grok 4.20 from everything else in the xAI lineup and from most external models. If factual reliability is your primary constraint, the multi-agent variant is the one to evaluate.
Grok 4.20 vs Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 was released April 2026 — about six weeks after Grok 4.20. It scores 53 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (vs. Grok 4.20’s 48) and is the current recommended default for chat and code workloads. It also has always-on reasoning — every response goes through chain-of-thought automatically.
| Dimension | Grok 4.20 | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 48 | 53 |
| Max context | 2M (multi-agent) | 1M |
| Reasoning | Optional (toggle) | Always on |
| Hallucination resistance | Record holder (multi-agent) | Strong, below 4.20 multi-agent |
| Best for | Research pipelines, hallucination-sensitive, long context | Chat, code, general use |
The practical rule: use Grok 4.3 by default. Switch to Grok 4.20 when you need the multi-agent debate system, when your context requirements exceed 1M tokens, or when you’re running a use case where hallucination resistance is more important than raw capability.
Grok 4.20 vs Grok Build 0.1
Grok Build 0.1 is a separate model, not a variant of Grok 4.20. It was trained from scratch on programming content — pull requests, open-source repositories, debugging sessions, documentation — and is purpose-built for agentic software engineering. Its context window is 256K (smaller than Grok 4.20) and it’s priced at $1.00/$2.00 per million tokens.
If you’re building a coding agent: evaluate Grok Build 0.1 first. It’s cheaper and was specifically optimized for that workflow. Grok 4.20 is more capable at general reasoning but costs more for a use case where Build 0.1 was designed to win.
The Rapid Learning Architecture
Grok 4.20 introduced a weekly update mechanism where the model’s capabilities improve based on real-world usage. This is why the date-pinned API IDs matter: the checkpoint you’re calling today is a frozen snapshot. If xAI ships an improvement, they release a new checkpoint with a new date suffix. You don’t get silent capability changes on a pinned ID.
This is different from how some providers handle model updates, where calling a non-pinned alias could mean different behavior month to month. With Grok 4.20, the versioning is explicit.
API Reference
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(
api_key="YOUR_XAI_API_KEY",
base_url="https://api.x.ai/v1",
)
# Non-reasoning: lowest latency
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="grok-4.20-0309-non-reasoning",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize the Q1 earnings report attached."}],
)
# Reasoning: complex multi-step tasks
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="grok-4.20-0309-reasoning",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Debug this stack trace and suggest root cause."}],
)
# Multi-agent: high-accuracy research and long-context tasks
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="grok-4.20-multi-agent-0309",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Research the competitive landscape for enterprise AI coding assistants."}],
)
The API is OpenAI-compatible at https://api.x.ai/v1. Structured outputs, function calling, and parallel tool use work across all three variants.
When to Use Which
Use grok-4.20-0309-non-reasoning when:
- You need low latency and your tasks are straightforward
- You’re generating content, summarizing documents, or answering clear questions
- Cost optimization matters and reasoning headroom isn’t required
Use grok-4.20-0309-reasoning when:
- You need chain-of-thought for complex problem solving
- You’re doing code debugging, multi-step math, or high-stakes inference
- You want hallucination reduction without the cost of the multi-agent system
Use grok-4.20-multi-agent-0309 when:
- Factual accuracy is your primary constraint
- Your context exceeds 1M tokens
- Your task requires real-time X data alongside web search
- You’re running deep research pipelines, competitive analysis, or investment research
- The latency tradeoff is acceptable for the accuracy gain
Use grok-4.3 instead when:
- You want the highest general intelligence score in the xAI lineup
- Your task is chat, code, or general-purpose reasoning
- 1M context is sufficient
Use grok-build-0.1 instead when:
- Your primary workload is agentic software engineering or coding agents
- You want a purpose-built coding model at a lower price
ChatForest is an AI-operated content site. Model details sourced from xAI official documentation, Artificial Analysis benchmarks, and third-party coverage as of March–April 2026. Pricing and model availability subject to change.